Skip to content
Gilbert Hip Guide
A maker-minded comparison of hip options

Gilbert Hip Guide

What do people ask about a sore hip?

This page answers the questions people often bring to a hip visit. The exact sore spot changes many of the answers. A hands-on exam gives better direction than a broad promise.

Could care made from blood or tissue replace hip surgery?

Care made from blood or tissue could be discussed before surgery. It can't promise to replace an operation. Severe soreness at rest or a major loss of movement can make surgery more likely. An exam and X-ray help a doctor explain which choices still fit you.

What is platelet-rich plasma, or PRP, and how long might it help?

PRP is fluid prepared when clinic staff spin a tube of your blood. This gathers platelets, the small blood pieces that help with clotting. Staff put that fluid into the chosen hip area with a needle. Relief has no single reliable length, so ask when your response will be checked.

Is PRP better for the hip than the knee?

Research from the knee can't settle what happens in the hip. Studies of the hip joint also differ from studies of outer-hip tendons. A doctor or nurse must match the sore spot and exam to the right research.

Does less soreness mean the hip rebuilt itself?

No, less soreness and a changed joint are separate results. Walking may improve even when an X-ray or scan looks the same. Don't take symptom relief alone as proof that new cartilage or bone grew.

Does taking blood or tissue add risk?

A blood draw differs from taking marrow or fat. Marrow is drawn from the back of the pelvis, while fat is removed from under the skin. Each added needle step brings its own care and recovery, so tell the doctor about medicines, bleeding, and infection concerns.

Does exercise still matter if I choose a procedure?

Yes, gentle strength exercise and sensible activity still matter. A needle procedure doesn't replace the movement that helps with daily walking. Ask how far to walk during recovery and when to add more exercise. QC Kinetix offers Chandler consultations and regenerative options, meaning non-surgical care prepared from blood or tissue.

Sources

  1. A randomized trial of 90 patients with KL grade 1-3 knee OA found bone marrow aspirate concentrate - the product most often sold as a 'stem cell injection' - was EQUIVALENT to, not better than, PRP through 24 months, with no statistically significant IKDC or WOMAC difference at any time point. Both arms improved from baseline and plateaued at 3 months.

    Anz AW, et al. — Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Is Equivalent to Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis at 2 Years: A Prospective Randomized Trial.. The American journal of sports medicine, 2022. DOI: 10.1177/03635465211072554.

  2. A Level-1 systematic review of 8 randomized trials (937 patients) of bone marrow aspirate concentrate for knee OA found BMAC improved clinical scores versus baseline from one month, and beat hyaluronic acid on pain at 6 and 12 months with statistical significance - but those differences DID NOT EXCEED the minimal clinically important difference, and against other injections no significant difference appeared at all. Statistically detectable is not the same as noticeable.

    Han JH, et al. — Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Injections for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.. Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241296555.

  3. A meta-analysis of 9 Level-1 trials (671 patients) of adipose stromal vascular fraction and adipose-derived MSC injections for knee OA found SVF superior to saline or hyaluronic acid on pain and function at 3, 6 and 12 months - but INFERIOR to corticosteroid at 3 months, no different at 6, and only comparable or slightly superior at 12. Adipose-derived MSCs beat saline and conservative care but showed no significant difference versus HA. No serious adverse events were attributed to the injections themselves, though complications associated with the LIPOSUCTION step were observed.

    Han JH, et al. — Intra-articular Stromal Vascular Fraction and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injections Show Variable Efficacy and Higher Potential Complications Compared to Corticosteroid and Hyaluronic Acid in Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.. Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.050.

  4. The evidence overview underpinning the 2020 EULAR recommendations on intra-articular therapies pooled 29 quality-appraised systematic reviews. Hyaluronic acid showed a small effect on pain and function in KNEE OA but not in hip OA or shoulder capsulitis; intra-articular glucocorticoid showed small effects in knee OA and on function in hip OA and shoulder capsulitis; PRP showed benefit in knee OA but NOT in hip OA, and mesenchymal stem cells behaved similarly. Overall conclusion: most intra-articular therapies exert SMALL effects and are well tolerated.

    Rodriguez-García SC, et al. — Efficacy and safety of intra-articular therapies in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: an overview of systematic reviews.. RMD open, 2021. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001658.

  5. A Bayesian network meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials (1353 patients) in hip osteoarthritis found that at 2-4 months and 6 months NO injectable - corticosteroid, hyaluronic acid or platelet-rich plasma - significantly outperformed a saline placebo injection for pain or function. Pooled change from baseline exceeded the minimal clinically important difference in every arm including placebo.

    Gazendam A, et al. — Intra-articular saline injection is as effective as corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid for hip osteoarthritis pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2021. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102179.

  6. A meta-analysis of 28 studies covering 480,532 patients found a significant association between pre-operative intra-articular corticosteroid injection and periprosthetic joint infection after TOTAL HIP arthroplasty (OR 1.55, P=.001), with higher risk when the injection was given within 3 months of surgery (OR 1.20, P=.045). No such association was found for knee arthroplasty. Timing of a hip injection matters if replacement may follow.

    Albanese J, et al. — Infection Risk Increases After Total Hip Arthroplasty Within 3 Months Following Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection. A Meta-Analysis on Knee and Hip Arthroplasty.. Journal of Arthroplasty, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.038.

What happens when you call the clinic?

Clinic staff first ask where the ache sits and when it appears. Bring any X-ray report and notes about your soreness. The medical provider, meaning the health worker who examines you, will discuss what may fit. QC Kinetix offers non-surgical regenerative care made from blood or tissue at the Chandler clinic.

Talk to the clinic team